Blood of the Fold

Recent Comments

1. 

   C. Young @ 7:36 pm

   First of all, I don’t understand all the harsh reviews of Terry Goodkind’s SoT series. Perhaps the themes in his books have appeared in other stories, but that’s true of every author. Any fantasy author who has written about magic, wizards, beautiful women, elves, dwarves, dragons, swords, quests, traveling, a great evil foe, etc. has copied that theme from someone else. Many reviewers compare these stories to Robert Jordan’s. They may have similarities, but the biggest difference is that Goodkind’s books are INTERESTING. If Robert Jordan came up with these themes first (which he didn’t), he sure didn’t know what to do with them. I’m glad that Goodkind did. It takes Jordan a whole book just to get his characters to finish breakfast.

   Others have recommended Terry Brooks over Terry Goodkind while in the same breath complaining that Goodkind copied the themes in his books. Did any of you ever read the Sword of Shannara? The first 100+ pages were a rip-off of The Fellowship of the Ring.

   One reviewer, who ranked this book with ONE STAR wrote, “The evil emperor simply wants to control the world, wow…that’s so amazing. We have no idea why he wants to control the world or how he got in a position to do that”. If this reader had actually bothered to read the words INSIDE the book, he/she would know that why Jagang wanted to rule and also why he has the power he does. If you’re going to rank a book as ONE at least read it. If you can’t understand it, that’s your problem, not the book’s.

   My last tirade is concerning the repetition others have complained about. He does fill you in on things you might have forgotten from previous books, but it is not overdone in the least. I think it is very helpful, especially if you read the books as they were published and had to wait a long time between each one.

   My comments on this whole series can be summed up in the phrase, “it’s great”! I read the books; I enjoyed them thoroughly and would recommend others read them.

   
2. 

   Anonymous @ 8:57 pm

   Many of these reviews have really bashed Goodkind’s book, so I would like to say my piece. I have not read Robert Jordan, but I have read David Eddings and many other such fantasy quest writers. I have enjoyed them all. I would like to point out that “there is nothing new under the sun.” So everyone complaining about how Goodkind borrows such and such needs to shut-up. Most of the fantasies I’ve read have been very similar in plot and character, but each is very good according to how the author goes about it.

   I must say that I find Goodkind unique. I do feel that the story could use less violence because some of it is gratuitous. But I find his characters very real and touching. They are very easy to empathize with. I found myself actually crying with the characters.

   Many fantasy authors I have read are fun to read but I have no trouble putting down most of their books (with the exception of Tolkien and Brooks) when I have to. Goodkind, on the other hand, keeps enough mystery in his series to keep you hooked. It’s got lots of action and even romance, albeit a troubled one.

   I see many of you complaining because the characters are flawed–some of them are really flawed.I really like this because if we’re honest with ourselves, we don’t always go around pure as the driven snow. Everyone has a really bad side to them even if they do have to dig deep to find it.

   Goodkind has presented characters who are struggling to do what’s right against powerful odds. Yes the Confessors are a strange group to belong with the good guys. But I don’t think Goodkind is trying to present the ‘good guys’ as being perfect. He’s saying, ‘OK, here’s somebody willing to compromise. Let’s get a wedge in there and maybe we can change the whole system.’ Kahlan is that wedge. Yes she is the Mother Confessor but she is very burdened by this and would like to change the way a lot of things are done. If some of you would read a litte more carefully you would realize that she doesn’t like the way the Confessors have ! been operating. Another example of change is the way Richard is trying to influence those chicks with the torturing rods. He has also made quite an impact on the Sisters of Light. They are the scariest ‘good guys’ I’ve ever seen!

   Goodkind’s world is not always pretty. In fact, it’s often downright ugly and scary. This makes it seem all the more real and fascinating. Perfection is boring.

   Goodkind has created an entertaining series that is sure to win more and more fans. His characters are real and most are dynamic not static. He keeps the revelations coming on top of more mysteries. He presents a world, though superficially different than ours, that is actually quite close to home. But his protagonists are characters who can and do rise above adversity. They are not perfect and make their share of mistakes, but you love them for it. Why, because Goodkind has created characters we would like to be.

   Thank you, Mr. Goodkind, for your series.

   
3. 

   Alan Mills @ 9:09 pm

   There is no question Terry Goodkind can write a spell binding fantasy adventure. Like the first two books, Goodkind combines magic, action, and good old human frailty and self doubt into a page turning story which makes the reader desperate to find out what happened to these characters after the book ends.

   That said, this book was not up to the quality of the first two installments of the Sword of Truth series. First, the action sequences were too short and not well connected to the rest of the plot. But more importantly, by having his main characters spread all through his Old and New Worlds, not knowing what each of the others were doing, lead to a disconnected plot. There were simply too many unknowns, which despite the 600+ page length, were never meshed into a coherent story.

   Finally, Goodkind spent far to much of the book first setting up the penultimate battle between good and evil–actually two battles–and then spent too much time setting up what were obvious tantalizers to the next installment in the series.

   On the positive side, we did learn all about Gars and Mirswiths–making them seem like thinking, sentient beings rather than just creatures of magic programmed to be good or evil.

   All in all, a good read–but definitely don’t start the series here. Must read one and two first, or this book will be a waste.

   
4. 

   Anonymous @ 9:46 pm

   After reading Wizards First Rule, and Stone of Tears I was, to put it lighty, intrigued by the Sword of Truth series. Yes, I realized it’s obvious faults and blantant silliness, but I turned to reading Goodkind after having my mind weighed down by to much philosophy and heavy reading; I needed to think less and observe more. In the first two books, my expectations were met. I was captivated by the story, but to be honest his writing ability does not seem to excede that of a middle school level. Imaginative though. Let’s face it, if I had a problem with reading childish gobbledy gook, I wouldn’t be be attempting to read fantasy novels, so I continued to “Blood of the Fold” out of a sense of duty as well as an interest. Though about 400 pages shorter than its predecessors, “Blood of the Fold” took me at least twice as long to read. The themes reaked of redundancy, as well as the plot line. I suspect that perhaps Goodkind wanted to save new-comers to the series the trouble of reading the first two novels. This is the only hypothesis that I can form as to why he would write numerous sixth-gradish paragraphs quickly recapping on past novels.

   I was, to say the least, disapointed with “Blood of the Fold”. The Sword of Truth series takes a plunge for the worst here, and in my opinion, never resurfaces.

   
5. 

   Anonymous @ 12:38 am

   He’s got the one dimensional character thing down pat. Goofy, but extremely powerful wizard who does nothing. Big, handsome doofus. Guy with lots of weapons. Lesbian sado-masochists… Is this supposed to be interesting? Or did Terry have a D&D campaign that got really weird? Why does everyone get more or less powerful depending upon what moves the plot? Adie kicked the asses of numerous undead creatures on her own, yet her and Zedd couldn’t take down the reanimated remains of something that Adie had already slain herself! Why is it that Gars can’t see an elephant unless its running at top speed, yet they can see a mriswith 500 miles away? Stop the Contradictions!